Author: admin

Ghalenoei needs a re-think

Amir Ghalenoei, seems to be living in denials with some of his post-match statements proving that. Despite winning 1-0 against Kyrgyzstan, that match was one to forget for Team Melli supporters who are surely least interested in Ghalenoei’s justification that Real Madrid HAS NOT STARTED THE SEASON WELL! an improved version of the match report:


Hamid Derakhshan , a former Team Melli player, was one of the persons who expressed concerns and doubts following the narrow victory calling it a wake-up call for the team. Derakhshan evaluated the performance, stating, “This game did not meet our expectations of Team Melli. Although we secured three points, this result does not align with our World Cup aspirations. We need to make changes in our gameplan, player selection, and tactics to improve quality and tactics.”

The system that Ghalenoei has implemented has created a dependency on individual performance, hence his pre-match statement about giving Taremi the freedom of the field. Derakhshan emphasized the importance of teamwork and a robust game system, warning, “If we rely solely on individual creativity, we will face significant challenges.” He urged for changes in the type of game, tactics, and system to enhance player performance and spectator enjoyment.

Addressing the poor field conditions, Derakhshan dismissed it as an excuse, noting, “The pitch was equally bad for both teams, yet Kyrgyzstan played better. We must acknowledge our shortcomings and seek realistic solutions rather than blaming external factors.”

Despite having skilled players in attack, midfield, and defense, Derakhshan pointed to systemic issues. “Our problem lies in the game system and teamwork. We have quality players, but we need to use them effectively to advance and increase their technical knowledge.”

In his assessment of the Kyrgyz team, Derakhshan acknowledged their strong performance, adding, “If not for a mistake by their goalkeeper, we might not have scored. We expected to score at least three goals against them. This result is a clear signal that the national team needs immediate improvements.”

one of the statistics that amplified the poor performance of Iran against Kyrgyzstan was in the shots on goal. While Team Melli attempted 20 shots, only 3 were on target. Kyrgyzstan attempted 7 shots on goal of which 6 were on target and thanks to Beiranvand, they failed to score. This figure is alarming for Team Melli. Whether these wayward shots were due to a lack of discipline where players just randomly shot way off target, or if it was part of the coach’s game plan, it went wrong.


PLAYERS’ SELECTION

There is little doubt that Ghalenoei picked his best lineup. Playing the likes of Yousefi and Hezbavi in defense, and Gholizadeh and Noorafkan in the midfield was a sound decision on paper. Unfortunately, the team as a whole performed badly and that is little to do with the selection. To make matters worse, the substituted players were nowhere near as good as the ones they replaced. What remains for Ghalenoei is a re-think of the game plan and strategy. He has immense power at the front, but they are not being served well by the midfield and the backs.

PLAYERS THAT NEED TIME OFF.

Yousefi: A player for the future with some good potential, however, his few appearances with Team Melli indicate to us that it is too early for this player to be in the lineup.

Noorafakan: Slow thinking, short of pace, and easily out-maneuvered, which makes him a bad choice for midfield.

Ezatollahi: Still that ineffective player who cannot influence that game and has no individual technique to cover much of his weaknesses. His continuous selection and playing for Team Melli remains an Enigma especially since he played against Kyrgyzstan after being out of action for 3 months!

And finally, Saman Ghoddos. What happened to that creative, Dynamic player of the past is indeed sad. He was way off his best against the Kyrgyz, however, the alternatives in Team Melli are lacking. Simply said, Iran’s domestic football lacks creative and influential midfield players. We can only think of one player that could perhaps be a good replacement, Mohammad Javad Hosseinnejad the 21-year-old who plays like a seasoned professional, however, he is not even in the squad.

PLAYER SORELY MISSING.
Ramin Rezaeian. Surely the omission of the Esteghlal right back is not based on performance, but more personal or other factors. It is not also based on age as those older than him are in the squad. His magic run, shots, dynamism, and even goal-scoring, were missing against Kyrgyzstan. Ghalenoei needs to re-think his exclusion and come to terms with that.

 


 

Iran Squad FIFA FutsalWorld Cup 2024

FIFA officially announced the squads of all the teams taking part in the FIFA Futsal World Cup Uzbekistan 2024. Team Melli’s list included all the players available, with no major concerns about injuries or suspensions.

The squad:

Team Melli squad – FIFA Futsal World Cup Uzbekistan 2024

Matches

Group F

[edit]

PosTeamPldWDLGFGAGDPtsQualification
1 Iran00000000Knockout stage
2 Venezuela00000000
3 Guatemala00000000Possible Knockout stage
4 France00000000

First match(es) will be played: 16 September 2024. Source: FIFA

16 September 2024

17:30

16 September @ 17:00Iran  VenezuelaBukhara Universal Sports Complex, Bukhara
16 September @ 20:00Guatemala  FranceBukhara Universal Sports Complex, Bukhara
19 September @ 17:30Iran  GuatemalaBukhara Universal Sports Complex, Bukhara
19 September @ 20:00France  VenezuelaBukhara Universal Sports Complex, Bukhara
22 September @ 20:00France Iran Bukhara Universal Sports Complex, Bukhara
22 September @ 20:00 VenezuelaGuatemala Humo ArenaTashkent

Post Match analysis

Passing Woes and Twisted Logic

When players cannot pass properly to their teammates—a basic skill in football—what can you expect from them? These were the words of a veteran ex-Team Melli player commenting on the match. However, according to Ghalenoei’s logic, Iranian fans should be grateful to his players even turning up, because even Real Madrid, Australia, and South Korea have bad days too! Twisted logic at its best!

Kyrgyzstan’s Improved Performance

Kyrgyzstan, a third-tier team in Asia, was comprehensively defeated last time out against Team Melli. However, this time, we witnessed a respectable highly disciplined. The Kyrgyz team was more organized and defensively solid, even on the same atrocious turf that Iran was playing on. The good performance of the Kyrgyz team was aided by the Iranian players’ lackluster performance.

Goalkeeping Errors and Missed Opportunities

If it wasn’t for the unfortunate error by the Kyrgyzstan goalkeeper—his only mistake of the game, where he parried a long-range shot from Noorafkan—the match would have ended goalless. On the other end, a fingertip save from Beiranvand prevented a freak goal in the first half. The Team Melli keeper repeated his heroics in the second when he prevented Joel, the nifty African-Kyrgyz winger, from scoring at close range.

Iran’s Lack of Superiority

Let us remember that Iran scored due to a goalkeeping error and not because of the superiority of their players. The most noticeable weakness of Team Melli was the midfield. The old dependable player who dictated the rhythm and pace of the team is no more. Perhaps the turn-up by name, but NOT the performance.

Ghoddos and Ghaedi had a forgettable game, Gholizade tried but his final ball always missing target, even an empty net. Noorafakn was out of place and out of pace. The comp[position of the midfield was not ticking.

Pitch Conditions and Tactical Failures

The embarrassing shape and status of the grass field and the solid, compact defensive style of Kyrgyzstan caused Iran to run out of ideas. Ghalenoei failed to adjust the team tactics to counteract such a style. The quality was lacking in every aspect of the game plan for Team Melli—passing, penetration, crosses, covering spaces, and most definitely, dribbling were all poor. Ghalenoei must fundamentally rethink the defense line and midfield. If this continues, Team Melli will have very tough days ahead, especially when they meet UAE, who came out as winners against the AFC Asian Cup holder Qatar with a convincing 3-1 score.

Beiranvand’s Mixed Performance

Alireza Beiranvand was a mixture of heroism and stupidity. His fast reflexes saved Iran’s blushes when he stopped Kyrgyz winger Joel from scoring from close range. However, his stupidity was evident when he was caught lingering around the halfway line, taking a stroll due to no action on his side. The Kyrgyz player cleverly noticed this and sent a hopeful ball from inside Kyrgyzstan’s half toward the empty goal. Beiranvand had to make an Olympic-style dash to save his blushes with a fingertip save over top of the bar for a corner.

Substitution Decisions

Ghalenoei’s substitutions were mixed. He was quite right in pulling out Gholizadeh, Gaheydi, and Ghoddos as the trio were just not ticking. However, apart from Torabi, Jahanbakhsh and Ezatollahi were even worse.

Feeble Performance and World Cup Qualifiers

The players did not perform as expected. It is quite fortunate that at least eight teams from AFC Asia will qualify for the World Cup. If only 2 to 3 teams were to qualify, Iran would definitely face a huge problem based on such a feeble performance.

PLAYERS RATINGS:

Alireza BEIRANVAND: Although had not much to do throughout the match, two brilliant timely saves rescued Iran from an embarrassing result. Guilty of leaving his goal wide open for no reason.[6.5]

Amin HEZBAVI: Despite a solid performance, he was found wanting when outfoxed by Joel who nearly scored, otherwise an acceptable performance. [6.0]

Arya YOUSEFI: Surprisingly had much action and balls on his side. He had difficulties dealing with all the action. He was not assertive in his passing or positions. His decision-making was suspect although he did not have much defending to do. [4.6]

Shojaa KHALILZADEH: Facing an average side without much appetite for attacking, Khalilzadeah had an easy shift, however, he was the target of his head coach for some bad passing [4.9]

Milad MOHAMMADI: an easy day for defensive duties but much was expected from him on the left flank. Simply said, he failed to deliver and was disappointing [4.6]

Ali GHOLIZADEH: Skillful player without a doubt. His dribbling is at times a joy to watch, but the end result was disappointing against an average team. He was guilty of the miss of the match as a perfect pass from Taremi found him meters from an open goal, but he managed to shoot over the bar. It seemed to be easier to score than missing [5.0]

Omid NOORAFKAN: Poor ball distribution, suspect in defending in the middle of the field, slow in tackling, and generally seemed to be out of place in a midfield role rather than half back, His only positive efforts was trying to shoot, mostly inaccurate but one of them yielded a result. Perhaps, the midfield is not his optimal post [5.1]

Saman GHODDOS: Totally out of the game. A very disappointing performance from a player who at one stage was the maestro of the team. He lacked in every department. His performance proves for the umpteen times that regular competition and playing are vital for a player. [4.3]

Sardar AZMOUN: Disappointing day for such a star. There is no doubt in his abilities as a striker and lethal finisher, however, there are many questions about his attitude. His body language seemed to be of a player who was uninterested. Sardar contributed little to the team until he mysteriously fell on the ground late in the match for him to be substituted!. [4.3]

Mehdi TAREMI: Best of the lot. Scored Iran’s goal and his running and dynamism in changing posts, confused the opponent’s defense. Had his own shortfalls but no one can accuse this player of lack of effort [6.8]

Mehdi GHAEDI: a forgettable game for this tiny winger who could not do anything right. No contribution to the team’s offense and could not create any threat from his side after being tightly marked by the Kyrgyz defender [4.0]

SUBSTITUTES:

Mehdi TORABI -> Ali GHOLIZADEH (59): His efforts and runs, briefly, energized the midfield, however, on his own, the contribution was lost. Torabi needs to be utilized as a ball carrier as he was with Queiroz days as that is his best role. [6.0]

Alireza JAHANBAKHSH -> Mehdi GHAEDI (59): On paper, a perfect substitution but in reality, Jahanbakhsh was quite disappointing. Like Ghoddos , he is without a club and lacks practice which was quite obvious in his shaky performance. Many passing errors which brought the wrath of Ghlenoei on the sidelines [4.2]

Saeid EZATOLAHI -> Saman GHODDOS (66): Only recently out of injury and has not played for 3 months, yet Ghalenoei in his wisdom, chose him to play him hoping to revitalize the midfield against the Kyrgyz. When at his best, Ezatollahi is no more than average, with a lack of match practice, he was quite poor. It was a risk that the coach took a risk that could cost him high against better teams in the group [4.0]

Shahriyar MOGHANLOU -> Sardar AZMOUN (80)
Saleh HARDANI -> Arya YOUSEFI (80)


MATCH REVIEW: Iran vs Kyrgyzstan

Overview

Iran’s Team Melli played a historic match in Esfahan, marking the first time the team has played in this city since its inception in 1940. The sell-out, vociferous crowd of over 20,000 filled Fooladshahr Stadium in anticipation of a solid performance and result from the number one favorite of this group.

Team Line-up

Head Coach, Amir Ghalenoei, who has been sticking to the familiar names in his lineup, made an exception for the match against the Kyrgyz Republic sidelining team captain, Jahanbakhsh, central defender Kananizadegan and the defensive midfielder Ezatollahi.

Goalkeeper: Alireza Beiranvand retained his place despite some shaky performances in the league.

  • Defense:
    • Central Defense Partnership: Amin Hezbavi and Shoja’a Khalilzadeh.
    • Full-backs: Ariya Yousefi and Milad Mohammadi.
  • Midfield:
    • Midfield : Saman Ghoddos, Ali Gholizadeh, Omid Noorafkan, and Mehdi Ghayedi.
  • Forward Line:
    • Strikers: Sardar Azmoun, Mehdi Taremi.

Match Performance

Match Performance

As anticipated, Iran dominated possession, leaving little room for the Kyrgyz team to breathe. However, the hosts struggled to turn this domination into goals on a pitch more suitable for grazing than playing international football. The only goal of the match came in the 44th minute when Mehdi Taremi slotted the ball home after Noorafkan’s long-range shot was parried by the Kyrgyz keeper.

Despite Iran initially controlling most of the play in the first half, the final balls from the midfield players were poor, failing to provide quality passes to Azmoun and Taremi up front. Apart from Noorafkan’s shot that led to Taremi’s goal, there were no shots on target by the Iranians. The atrocious pitch with multi-colored patches was possibly a factor, but the main blame should go to the ineffective midfield, poor basic passing, and some arrogance issues. The trio of Ghoddos, Ghayedi, Noorafkan, and Gholizadeh were at their worst. Much was expected from Ghoddos in this game, but his lack of match practice was evident. Noorafkan, usually a right back, was deployed in the midfield, which proved to be a bad idea. Gholizadeh huffed and puffed and executed a few dribbles, but his final balls were wasteful. Remarkably, Team Melli had just one shot on goal, which was the one scored by Taremi.

Despite leading 1-0 at halftime, Ghalenoei was visibly upset by the poor performance of his team. It was a poor show for Team Melli against a solid, disciplined team with compact defending.

The second half was not much better despite the substitutions forced on Ghalenoei, where Ghoddos and Gholizadeh were replaced by Jahanbakhsh and Ezatollahi. With Team Melli failing to add to their single goal, the Kyrgyz team became bolder and more effective. The brilliance of Beiranvand prevented Joel Kpjo from equalizing after he cleverly left Hizbavi and Khalilzadeh chasing shadows. Beiranvand’s timely interception was a face-saving act.

Overall, this was a shaky start by Iran. Ghalenoei was less than pleased by some of the players’ antics. His changes may not have yielded results, but most of the blame goes to the players who failed to turn up and were found wanting by a team they beat 5-1 the last time they met.

In the same group, UAE is leading the table after the first round, having beaten Qatar 3-1 in Doha, while Uzbekistan narrowly defeated North Korea 1-0 in an earlier match.

Iran’s first goal came in the

Iran vs Kyrgyzstan: Match Review


On Thursday, Team Melli will face Kyrgyzstan for the fifth time at Fooladshahr Stadium in Esfahan. The two teams last met in the CAFA Nations Cup, where Team Melli secured a dominant 5-1 victory in Bishkek.

There have been few changes in both squads, with the most significant being the appointment of Maksim Lisitsyn as the new head coach for Kyrgyzstan, replacing Š. Tarkovič.

The teams first crossed paths in the preliminary round of the FIFA World Cup France 1998 in Damascus, where Team Melli comfortably defeated the newly independent Kyrgyz side with a 7-0 win.

With almost all key players available for Amir Ghalenoei, Team Melli is expected to secure a convincing victory. The forward line of Team Melli is arguably the strongest in Asia, featuring the likes of Mehdi Taremi and Sardar Azmoun up front, with Ali Gholizadeh, Alireza Jahanbakhsh, and Mehdi Ghayedi operating on the flanks.

However, concerns remain in defense, particularly with an aging center-back duo and a lack of defensive cohesion that has seen Team Melli concede goals against various opponents. Alireza Beiranvand, a stalwart in goal for many years, has experienced a dip in form, making his position less secure.

The midfield also presents challenges, as players like Saman Ghoddos, Jahanbakhsh, and Saeid Ezatollahi have struggled with match fitness and practice, with the first two currently without clubs. The team will rely on Gholizadeh to inject creativity and dynamism.

Despite these issues, Team Melli should have little trouble winning this match, and anything less would be considered a significant setback, especially in a competitive group that includes AFC Asian Cup holders Qatar and strong opponents like Uzbekistan and the UAE.


Teams Last 5 matches

Kyrgyzstan

Iran

Head2Head Results

H / A / NMatchesWDLGoals+ / –
H22009 – 1+8
A11005 – 1+4
N11007 – 0+7
Total440021 – 2+19
DateComp.H / A / NFinal scoreVenue CityAttendance
16.06.2023CAFA Nations Cup A5 – 1Bishkek10000
07.06.2016FriendlyH6 – 0 Tehran4500
09.06.1997World Cup QualifierH3 – 1Tehran50000
04.06.1997World Cup Qualifier N7 – 0Damascus25000
The matches

Ghalenoei Criticizes Lack of Suitable Stadiums for International Matches


Amir Ghalenoei, the head coach of Iran’s national football team, expressed his frustration over the inadequate stadium facilities available for international matches in the country. Speaking at a pre-match press conference ahead of Iran’s game against Kyrgyzstan, Ghalenoei did not hold back in addressing the shortcomings.

“There has been a clear lack of effort and attention to this issue, which has resulted in this unfortunate situation,” Ghalenoei stated. “However, I appreciate the efforts of Zob Ahan Club and its management for preparing Fooladshahr Stadium for this match. Their work has saved us from potential embarrassment.”

Ghalenoei further mentioned that other provinces, despite having larger and more suitable stadiums, refused to cooperate with Team Melli, leaving them with limited options. “Fooladshahr has a decent pitch, but it requires proper maintenance. The turf has an expiration date and should be regularly cared for to remain usable,” he urged.

Analyzing the Opposition

Turning his focus to the upcoming game, Ghalenoei praised Kyrgyzstan’s new head coach for his deep understanding of the nation’s football system, having coached at both grassroots and youth levels. “They are a hardworking team, especially strong defensively,” Ghalenoei remarked, noting that the match would be challenging.

The coach also commended the preparation of his own team, highlighting the success of their training camp. “The conditions have been excellent, and this has been one of the best camps we’ve held. The players are motivated and training with high intensity.”

Balancing Youth and Experience

Ghalenoei acknowledged the ongoing criticism surrounding squad selection, especially regarding the balance between experienced players and younger talents. “Every time we announce a squad, we face criticism. We are working to lower the average age and bring in younger players to support the national team in the future. But these changes must be gradual and measured, ensuring we still get results while protecting the young players’ development.”

He emphasized the importance of careful selection: “Our choices are based on thorough analysis. We’ve been watching the players throughout the league, and while mistakes can happen, our process is transparent. The national team is open to everyone.”

For Ghalenoei, age is just a number. “It’s about quality and readiness. Our goal is to field a team that can combine youthfulness with strong performances. If we don’t get results, the same people who ask for rejuvenation will criticize us for not winning. So, we remain focused on our work and welcome constructive criticism, which helps us improve. Some of our critics are our own advisors.”

An Offensive Football Philosophy

Ghalenoei reaffirmed his commitment to an aggressive, offensive style of play. “Systems don’t win matches; players do. My approach is to play attacking football. My teams have a strong scoring record, and we will maintain this style, even if it costs us a result tomorrow. I can’t change my philosophy because it’s what the fans want to see. I’m here to serve the national team, and the players understand that we have to play a dynamic, spectator-friendly game.”

He also spoke highly of Mehdi Taremi, stating, “We’ve given Taremi the freedom to move across the field, supported by another striker. The players know exactly what’s expected of them.”

He also spoke about the leadership role that experienced players like Taremi play on the field, describing them as the “arm of the coaching staff” who help manage the team during matches. “We don’t expect anything extraordinary from Taremi. We just want him to be himself.”

Reflecting on Challenges

Ghalenoei touched on the challenges faced by the national team, including the strength of teams from the CAFFA region and the high expectations of Iranian fans. “If the players don’t give their best, I will hold them accountable. We’re here to bring joy to the people.”

He recalled a past experience to illustrate the dedication he expects from his players: “I remember when Ali Daei got injured during a match against Bahrain. I was the first person by his side, and he played 70 minutes with that injury. That’s the level of commitment I expect.”

Venue and Federation Challenges

Regarding the choice of venues, Ghalenoei admitted that some of the options for hosting matches were less than ideal, while there were better options “We could have played in better stadiums, but we had to make do with what was available from the people who welcomed Team Melli.”

Despite the difficulties faced, including the fact that the coaching staff have not been paid for months, Ghalenoei remained optimistic. “Our priority is the people. When they’re facing hardships, it’s not right for us to worry about our own financial issues. The Federation and management are doing their best, and so are we. The people’s happiness is what truly matters.”


Ghalenoei and Ghoddos on touchline

The Declining Quality of Players in Iran’s Domestic League: Are Selections Truly Based on Merit?

The latest roster for Iran’s national football team, announced for the upcoming FIFA matches against Kyrgyzstan and the UAE, has sparked significant debate. The declining quality of players in the Iranian Premier League has left Team Melli’s coach, Amir Ghalenoei, with difficult choices. While Ghalenoei has made efforts to address fans’ concerns and silence his critics, especially regarding his tendency to select the same veteran players, his latest squad decisions have raised questions about whether the selections are truly merit-based.

The Biggest Challenge

The declining standard of Iran’s league and the failure of the system to produce quality players at age levels and senior level remains the greatest challenge to any selector. Watching a domestic league football in Iran leaves a bad taste for football enthusiasts. Poor tactical and techniques, lack of players’ skills, sub-standard coach, lack of professionalism amongst players and staff, poor status of the pitches and general lack of managerial and organizational management that is rife in Iran, have resulted in poor product that is getting worse over the years. As such, the hands of Team Melli’s coach are tied, but even considering all those negative factors, many believe that Ghalenoei can do much better.

The Controversial Selection Process

Ghalenoei’s player selections have often been met with controversy and inconsistency. What he preaches to the press does not always align with his practices on the field.

Players Who Don’t Deserve Their Spot, while others are ignored.

Critics argue that Ghalenoei has included players who are either not physically ready, out of form, or simply lacking the quality to be part of the national team. While other deserving players are excluded. For instance, the exclusion of Ramin Rezaian, despite his excellent performances for Esteghlal in the new season, is puzzling. Rezaian has scored two goals and provided one assist in the last three weeks, earning praise from critics and fans alike. When questioned, Ghalenoei would likely justify this by citing his new policy of injecting youth and energy into the team, exemplified by the inclusion of 18-year-old goalkeeper Arsha Shakuri.

On the other hand, players like Saeed Saharkhizan and Mohammad Javad Hosseinnejad, who have been performing admirably in the Russian league, were overlooked. Hosseinnejad even scored a brilliant goal last week for his club, yet this wasn’t enough to earn him a place in the national squad.

The Shortage of Quality Players

The lack of high-quality, young players in Iranian football has left Ghalenoei with no choice but to rely on experienced familiar faces. In the midfield, the same regular players have been selected, which is understandable given the circumstances. However, some of these choices are questionable and even indefensible.

Saeid Ezatollahi
Ezatollahi, who plays for Shabab Al-Ahli, hasn’t played a single minute for his club due to recovering from a three-month injury. While Sardar Azmoun, his clubmate, is scoring regularly, Ezatollahi has just resumed serious training and is not yet in form for league competition. Yet, in Ghalenoei’s eyes, a fit but out-of-form player is good enough for selection. Ezatollahi, who has struggled throughout his career, remains a contentious choice, especially when players like Rouzbeh Cheshmi, with a proven track record, are ignored.

Arsha Shakouri
The young goalkeeper Shakouri, despite his potential, has shown inconsistency this season. While he did keep a clean sheet against Zob Ahan, he conceded five goals in the matches against Khyber Khorram Abad and Tractor. Meanwhile, Mohammad Reza Akhbari, who has two clean sheets and former national team experience, was left out of the squad. This raises questions about the criteria used for player selection and whether these decisions are truly data-driven.

Questionable Veteran Selections

The inclusion of Saeed Ezatollahi, Alireza Jahanbakhsh, and Saman Ghoddos in the national team also raises eyebrows. Ezatollahi has not played since June 6 due to injury, while Jahanbakhsh and Ghoddos have struggled in Europe, losing their starting positions and failing to secure contract renewals. Both are now free agents, yet they remain key figures in Ghalenoei’s squad, highlighting the lack of depth in the Iranian domestic league and the challenges facing Team Melli.

Abolfazl Jalali
Jalali, a talented defender, has been selected despite being injured before the start of the season and having minimal playing time. While his quality is undeniable, the timing of his inclusion is questionable.

Ehsan Haj Safi
If Ghalenoei is serious about rejuvenating the team, excluding the captain might make sense. However, Haj Safi remains a regular starter for AEK Athens and continues to perform well. Ignoring him while selecting players like Khalilzadeh, who is 34 years old, seems contradictory.

Shoja’a Khalilzadeh
Khalilzadeh, a long-time national team regular known for his fighting spirit, has been selected again despite his declining pace and temperamental issues. Ghalenoei’s insistence on using the same defensive tactics and personnel, despite the defense being the weakest link, is a point of concern.

Conclusion: A Lack of Insight in Selections?

While a coach can only choose from the best players available, Ghalenoei’s judgment and decision-making continue to be questioned. His criteria for player selection remain an enigma, lacking clear insight and logic.


Ghalenoei invites 26 players for Kyrgyzstan and UAE matches.

With 6 days to go, Amir Ghalenoei finally announced the squad that will face Kyrgyzstan at home and UAE away in the third-round qualifier matches of FIFA World Cup 2026.

The first two matches are significant for Team Melli as a good result will mean they will lead the group from the onset while putting pressure on the two contenders in the group, Qatar and Uzbekistan.

Iran and Uzbekistan have already met in the earlier qualifying stage with neither being able to defeat the other.

Iran is in Group E of the third round 2026 FIFA World Cup qualifiers along with Uzbekistan, Qatar, Korea Rep, Kyrgyzstan and UAE. The names of the players invited to the squad for the first two matches of the group were announced by head coach Amir Ghalenoei as follows:

Goalkeepers:

Alireza Beiranvand, Payam Niazmand, Hossein Hosseini, Arsha Shakouri

Defenders:

Shoja Khalilzadeh, Hossein Kanaanizadegan, Amin Hizbavi, Ali Nemati, Saleh Hardani, Milad Mohammadi, Abolfazl Jalali, Arya Yousefi

Midfielders:

Saeid Ezatollahi, Omid Nourafkan, Saman Ghoddos, Mohammad Karimi, Mohammad Ghorbani, Allhayar Sayyadmanesh, Ali Gholizadeh, Mehdi Torabi, Alireza Jahanbakhsh

Forwards:

Mehdi Taremi, Javad Aghaeipour, Sardar Azmoun, Shariyar Moghanlou, Mehdi Ghaeydi

Fooladshahr, is the venue for the next Team Melli match.

The Iranian Football Federation has announced that the match between Iran and Kyrgyzstan will be held at Foladshahr Stadium in Esfahan , which is equipped with VAR.

Iran’s national will face Kyrgyzstan in the third qualifying round of the 2026 FIFA World Cup on Thursday, September 5th. This match was supposed to be held at Azadi Stadium, which was moved to Naghshe Jahan Stadium in Isfahan due to the renovation of Azadi. The match between Sepahan and Shabab Al-Ahli was held in Naghshe Jahan highlighted the disastrous status of the pitch and raised many objections specifically from Team Melli’s coach.

The Stadium Standardization Headquarters, subsequently declared that due to the damage to the grass of Naghshe Jahan Stadium, the stadium in Esfahan cannot host this World Cup qualifier match and an alternative venue has to be nominated. Dawood Rafati, head of stadium standardization headquarters, went to Isfahan today and visited Folad Shahr Stadium. After the investigations, it was announced that the memorandum of understanding will be signed by tonight and the national team will face Kyrgyzstan at Foulad Shahr Stadium. The Football Federation will send the next VAR machine after Arak to Isfahan so that this game will be played with the help of a Video-Assisted Referee.

 Fooladshar is the home stadium of Zob Ahan and was opened in 1998. The stadium is listed as having a capacity of 15,000. its remote location away from Esfahan city and small capacity is not ideal venue of a match of this level for Team Melli. FooladShahr is about 45 km from Esfahan city center.

Mehdi Taj “Naghshe Jahan Stadium was a disgrace”

The Naghshe Jahan Stadium, located in Isfahan, has recently come under scrutiny due to its terrible turf conditions. During a match between Sepahan and Shabab Al-Ahli Dubai in the preliminary rounds of the AFC Elite League, the stadium’s shortcomings were evident and televised for the rest of the region. The President of the Iran Football Federation, Mehdi Taj, expressed his disappointment, emphasizing the need for urgent improvements.

Both Taj and Amir Ghalenoei, the head coach of Team Melli (the Iranian national football team), attended the match. Their observations highlighted serious concerns about the pitch quality. Naghshe Jahan Stadium is slated to host Team Melli’s match against Kyrgyzstan on September 5th, and the current conditions are far from acceptable.

Urgent Measures Needed

In a meeting of the working group for stadium standardization, Taj emphasized the urgency of addressing the stadium’s deficiencies. He acknowledged that Esteghlal and Persepolis clubs who do not own stadiums themselves, are responsible for introducing suitable stadiums. Both teams face challenges. Taj suggested that the football federation, akin to the AFC, should verify and approve stadiums after thorough assessments. Howevr, in Tehran in particular, there is a lack of suitable stadiums.

Collaborative Efforts

Taj called for collective efforts from all stakeholders, including government bodies. While praising the progress made so far in Azadi Stadium renovation works, he stressed that certain tasks should have been completed earlier. Azadi Stadium, the main venue, is currently undergoing essential renovations. Taj urged patience in properly completing the work, emphasizing the importance of not rushing to ensure long-term benefits and a quality finish.

Alternatives Considered

Regarding Naghshe Jahan Stadium’s suitability for hosting national team matches, Taj expressed reservations. The turf conditions pose serious problems, especially if opponents adopt a defensive strategy. The search for an alternative venue continues. Fortunately, stadiums like Azadi, Golgohar Sirjan, and Mes Rafsanjan are meeting expectations, however, each has some challenges too.

Challenges and Solutions

Kerman, unfortunately, lacks sufficient five-star hotels. Despite this, Taj remains optimistic. The Aluminum Arak Stadium is a viable option, and preparations are underway. However, Takhti Stadium faces security-related hurdles. Although ready for use, it lacks approval from police and intelligence services due to traffic concerns.

Club Contributions

Esteghlal and Persepolis clubs have stepped up by contributing 17.5 billion tomans each toward stadium improvements. Addressing traffic issues at Takhti Stadium remains a challenge, but Taj hopes to find a solution. Until Azadi Stadium is fully prepared, Takhti will host matches.

Collective Responsibility

In closing, Taj emphasized that stadium preparation is not solely the responsibility of the Football Federation. Collaboration among clubs, authorities, and the community is essential to elevate Iran’s football infrastructure.